Also sounds like it makes the old match-engine-speed-to-road-speed thing that you need for smooth shifting really hard, without a rev counter or engine note as a cue.Any idea why they kept the manual gearbox setup? Is it for maintaining the classic manual shifting experience, or more about efficiency gains? Because it sounds like shifting is quasi-optional, even if not optimal. And I imagine there would be some weight saving from ditching it so the reason to keep it is probably strong.
Also sounds like it makes the old match-engine-speed-to-road-speed thing that you need for smooth shifting really hard, without a rev counter or engine note as a cue.
I wonder if a dab of 'throttle' during the shift, or even double-declutching would help. Maybe it's about preserving shifting skills? It's an interesting interaction design choice.
My hunch is to do with minimising the amount of conversion work? That it still has a classic drive train from the clutch on, but the flywheel has been replaced with direct power from an electric motor?? Might be barking up the wrong tree, and the whole thing is a software simulation of manual shift, in order to retain the 'feel' of the original - given that's what a lot of us enjoy about driving vintage cars.Any idea why they kept the manual gearbox setup? Is it for maintaining the classic manual shifting experience, or more about efficiency gains? Because it sounds like shifting is quasi-optional, even if not optimal. And I imagine there would be some weight saving from ditching it so the reason to keep it is probably strong.
Saw that. It's labelled 'power' so not sure if it represents rpm anymore.One of the photos shows an analogue power gauge with numbers around the edge, I assume that's RPM of the motor?
Because it's so much more fun to drive!Any idea why they kept the manual gearbox setup? Is it for maintaining the classic manual shifting experience, or more about efficiency gains? Because it sounds like shifting is quasi-optional, even if not optimal. And I imagine there would be some weight saving from ditching it so the reason to keep it is probably strong.
Guessing from the 0-100 scale that it is the percent of power from the motor. Also guessing the 0-40 the other way that the drive train allows for some regenerative braking.One of the photos shows an analogue power gauge with numbers around the edge, I assume that's RPM of the motor?
I was wondering the same thing. Maybe to optimise the performance (torque & speed) of the motor against current draw...? But I think your first idea might be right.Any idea why they kept the manual gearbox setup? Is it for maintaining the classic manual shifting experience, or more about efficiency gains? Because it sounds like shifting is quasi-optional, even if not optimal. And I imagine there would be some weight saving from ditching it so the reason to keep it is probably strong.
But then you'll miss the classic character of plowing into a tree when the brakes don't work properlyIf they’re spending (many) tens of thousands on a meticulous restoration, you’d think they would upgrade the brake system to modern discs/calipers/hydraulics.
Thanks for posting this, I guess I've never looked at electric motor efficiency plots but this is pretty surprising considering the "common knowledge" that EVs don't need transmissions. That's actually a pretty huge difference, like between 95% at lowish RPM and ~70% at lower power but high speeds. Exactly like what you'd see at highway speeds.Peak efficiency of this motor is around 1200 rpms. With a continuous maximum rpms of 3300.
Long story short they wind these motor coils knowing you will be using an ICE drivetrain.
https://www.go-ev.com/PDFs/HyPer_9_Sales_Sheet.pdf
But then you'll miss the classic character of plowing into a tree when the brakes don't work properly
Thanks for posting this, I guess I've never looked at electric motor efficiency plots but this is pretty surprising considering the "common knowledge" that EVs don't need transmissions. That's actually a pretty huge difference, like between 95% at lowish RPM and ~70% at lower power but high speeds. Exactly like what you'd see at highway speeds.
It looks like they did:If they’re spending (many) tens of thousands on a meticulous restoration, you’d think they would upgrade the brake system to modern discs/calipers/hydraulics.
Would be super easy to learn to drive a stick- never stall the engine!Also sounds like it makes the old match-engine-speed-to-road-speed thing that you need for smooth shifting really hard, without a rev counter or engine note as a cue.
I wonder if a dab of 'throttle' during the shift, or even double-declutching would help. Maybe it's about preserving shifting skills? It's an interesting interaction design choice.
I have no idea why the author called the original engine "notoriously finicky".
They are the polar opposite of finicky. It's a very basic, under-stressed, carburated 4 banger. It'll run for ages with some maintenance, although the original carbs and ignition take more fiddling than modern fuel injection and electronics. It's pretty standard for cars of this era.
I have an MGB GT in my garage.
I suspect it is much more prosaic. You need a differential, the differential already in the transmission is ideally sized for the current suspension and axle lengths. It is hard to get the differential out of the transmission. It is very easy to mount the motor to the transmission. Therefore, just leave it in.Any idea why they kept the manual gearbox setup? Is it for maintaining the classic manual shifting experience, or more about efficiency gains? Because it sounds like shifting is quasi-optional, even if not optimal. And I imagine there would be some weight saving from ditching it so the reason to keep it is probably strong.
MGB had front disc brakes, and mine (1980) had power assisted brakes, though that was an option on earlier models.If they’re spending (many) tens of thousands on a meticulous restoration, you’d think they would upgrade the brake system to modern discs/calipers/hydraulics.
If that's the case, then why did the author mention that the brakes were substandard?It looks like they did:
Brakes front: 273 mm vented discs with 4-pot calipers
Brakes rear: 265 mm 2-pot calipers
I have recently looked into buying an mgb and a conversion like this would be awesome. However, I worry that it would be too expensive and out of my price range.
The reason I have been looking into an mgb is my parents had one when they first got married and loved it. I would buy it with the plan to let them drive it for a year and then i would sell it, hopefully recouping most of my money and would let me "pay them back" for college costs.
What has held me back is i am worried about the car suffering a major mechanical event during that one year of ownership.
I suspect it is much more prosaic. You need a differential, the differential already in the transmission is ideally sized for the current suspension and axle lengths. It is hard to get the differential out of the transmission. It is very easy to mount the motor to the transmission. Therefore, just leave it in.
They should surely shift this into a replica with some slight improvements.
Otherwise, it would be called a transaxle like a FWD car or RWD car like a 911.??
The differential is not in the Transmission. The differential is in the rear Axle. Which is connected to the transmission via drive shaft...
You said it right there yourself, The factory Strombergs can be a pain, and I think I already saw at least two references to the ‘Lucas, Prince of Darkness’ electrics in the comments.I have no idea why the author called the original engine "notoriously finicky".
They are the polar opposite of finicky. It's a very basic, under-stressed, carburated 4 banger. It'll run for ages with some maintenance, although the original carbs and ignition take more fiddling than modern fuel injection and electronics. It's pretty standard for cars of this era.
I have an MGB GT in my garage.
We call that soul and personality in vintage and collector car circles. You can line up three or four cars of the same model and year of production, and not only will they feel and sound different, but many claim they all drive slightly different from one another. Soul and personality.you can hear the odd squeak and rattle from panels that, despite Frontline's best efforts, don't quite go together properly. As the car's so small, the odd squeak from the door happens right next to your ear... it takes the shine off a touch.
Is it though? If you put a manual transmission on a bed would it be more fun to sleep in? Just seems unnecessary and it reduces efficiency. Remember that this is a vehicle where you're going to be shifting with no engine noise or mechanical feel, I'd have to try it myself to be sure but that doesn't sound fun to me.Because it's so much more fun to drive!